Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39969798›Full record

ArticleJournal of endocrinological investigation2025

Clinical and biological heterogeneity of Grade 2 digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms: prognostic significance of the 10% Ki-67 index cutoff and implications for treatment strategies. A longitudinal study.

Sara Massironi, Camilla Gallo, Lorenzo Coltro, Giuseppe Dell'Anna, Paoletta Preatoni, Silvio Danese

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sara MassironiVita e Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy. sara.massironi@libero.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3214-8192
Camilla GalloDigestive and Interventional Endoscopy Unit, ASST GOM Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Lorenzo ColtroDepartment of Medicine, Bicocca University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe Dell'AnnaGastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Paoletta PreatoniGastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Silvio DaneseVita e Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigestive neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) encompass a heterogeneous group of tumors with varying prognoses and clinical behaviors. Grade 2 (G2) tumors, defined by a Ki-67 index between 3% and 20%, are particularly challenging to manage due to their intermediate and variable biological behavior. Evidence suggests a distinct prognosis between G2 digestive NENs with a Ki-67 index < 10% and those with a Ki-67 index ≥ 10%.

aimTo investigate the clinical and biological heterogeneity between Grade 1 (G1) and G2 digestive NENs, and within G2 tumors, with a focus on the prognostic significance of a 10% Ki-67 index cutoff.

methodsThis study involved a combined retrospective and prospective analysis of patients with low-grade G1 and G2 digestive NENs managed at IRCCS San Gerardo Hospital in Monza, Italy, between January 2000 and May 2024. Data on patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes were collected and potential differences were analyzed between G1, G2 with Ki-67 index < 10% and G2 with Ki-67 index ≥ 10%.

resultsOut of a total of 113 enrolled patients, 69 (61%) had G1 tumors, and 44 (39%) had G2 tumors. Median tumor size at diagnosis was 19 mm (IQR: 12-25 mm), with primary lesions mainly localized in the pancreas (57% among G1 and 45% among G2). Most G1 tumors were diagnosed at stage I (29 patients, 42%), while the majority of G2 tumors were metastatic at diagnosis (24 patients, 54.5%). Patients with G1 tumors exhibited a slightly higher 5-year OS rate compared to G2 tumors (98.1% vs. 92.8% respectively, though not statistically significant), and a significantly longer median PFS (141 vs. 22 months, p = 0.0003). Within the G2 group, 31 patients (70%) had a Ki-67 index < 10%, while 13 (30%) had a Ki-67 index ≥ 10%, with comparable baseline characteristics. A Ki-67 index < 10% was associated with a significantly better median PFS (38 vs. 8 months for tumors with Ki-67 index ≥ 10% G2 tumors, p = 0.002). PFS after first-line medical therapy was significantly longer in patients with a Ki-67 index < 10%, compared to those with ≥ 10% (undefined vs. 16 months, p = 0.0085), as well as median post-surgical PFS (84 vs. 10.5 months, p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified higher tumor grade, advanced stage at diagnosis, and absence of PRRT as independent predictors of worse outcomes.

conclusionsThe findings highlight the significant clinical heterogeneity within G2 digestive NENs. A Ki-67 index cutoff of 10% within G2 tumors may serve as a critical prognostic marker, with patients with a Ki-67 index < 10% exhibiting significantly better outcomes in terms of PFS. These results suggest that the Ki-67 index could play an essential role in guiding treatment strategies, emphasizing the need for personalized approaches in managing G2 digestive NENs.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorDigestive System NeoplasmsKi-67 AntigenNeuroendocrine TumorsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansItalyLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorKi-67 AntigenGrade 2 neuroendocrine tumorsKi-67 indexNeoplasm GradingNeuroendocrine neoplasmsPeptide receptor Radionuclide TherapyProgression-free survival (PFS)Tumor heterogeneity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.