ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2025
Predicting outcomes in persistent atrial fibrillation: the impact of surface ECG f-wave amplitude following pulmonary vein isolation.
Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- How to interpret fibrillatory wave amplitude in patients receiving pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026Article
- NT-proBNP as a Predictor of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Cryoballoon, Radiofrequency and Pulsed-Field Ablation.Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 2026Article
- F-wave vector magnitude predicts recurrence after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFibrillatory wave amplitude (fWA) on 12-lead ECG predicts the outcome of ablation in atrial fibrillation (AF). We hypothesized that changes in fWA following wide circumferential isolation of pulmonary veins (WPVI) in persistent AF (peAF) is a better predictor of ablation outcome compared to baseline fWA.
methodsEighty-nine patients (sustained peAF 7 ± 7 months) underwent a first-time WPVI. Sixty-second ECG signals devoid of QRST waves were recorded at baseline and at the end of the WPVI (endWPVI). fWA for each ECG lead and mean fWA (meanfWA) across the 12-lead ECG were computed. Patients with recurrence after the index WPVI underwent a redo to ensure complete PVI. The primary endpoint was long-term AF freedom OFF antiarrhythmics drugs (AADs) after one or two WPVI (SUCCESS group). The FAILURE group was defined as AF recurrence post-redo.
resultsOver a mean follow-up of 35 ± 10 months, freedom from AF OFF AADs was achieved in 61% (SUCCESS group), while 29% had AF recurrence after redo WPVI (FAILURE group). The SUCCESS group showed significantly higher fWA values in ECG leads V
conclusionLow fWA values and a significant reduction in fWA following WPVI are associated with a high risk of AF recurrence in patients with peAF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.