Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39969776›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2025

Radiation Oncology Active Learning in Undergraduate Medical Education: The Usefulness of Kahoot and TikTok.

Irene Zapata-Martínez, Francisca Rius-Diaz, Rocío Lorenzo-Álvarez, Lourdes De la Peña-Fernández

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Network-Based Asynchronous Research Training in Breast Imaging: A Multinational Pre-Post Evaluation for Cancer Education.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Irene Zapata-MartínezDepartment of Pharmacology and Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Málaga, Campus Teatinos, Boulevard Louis Pasteur, 32, 29071, Málaga, Spain. irenezapata365@uma.es.ORCID 0000-0002-6899-8423
Francisca Rius-DiazDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8108-5031
Rocío Lorenzo-ÁlvarezRonda School of Nursing, University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3502-661X
Lourdes De la Peña-FernándezDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3517-863X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gamification and social networking can be used as active learning tools, as they have been shown to increase learner motivation. Nevertheless, it is unclear whether they impact students' knowledge acquisition. This study aimed to share an educational experience for medical students using Kahoot and TikTok as active teaching/learning tools and assessed whether they improve academic performance. A retrospective quasi-experimental study was conducted with 176 students enrolled in radiation oncology in the 2021/22 academic year (control group), who received traditional teaching, and 166 students in the 2022/23 academic year (experimental group), where Kahoot and TikTok were added to traditional teaching. Final exam results of both groups were compared to assess learning differences, as well as those of the experimental group in terms of participation in Kahoot and TikTok and their relationship with the final grade. Comparing the average exam scores of the experimental group to the control group showed an increase of 12.9% in the first group compared to the traditional group (6.02 vs. 7.31 points, p = 0.0001). In the experimental group, students who participated in Kahoot or TikTok increased their mean score by 0.54 points (p = 0.021) and 1.57 points (p = 0.040), respectively, compared to those who did not. A correlated increase in mean test scores was observed based on tool usage: none, Kahoot or TikTok, or both (6.19, 6.88 ± 1.48, and 7.51 ± 1.20 points, p = 0.019). Using Kahoot and TikTok as active learning tools for medical students improved academic performance when integrated with traditional methodology.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateProblem-Based LearningRadiation OncologyStudents, MedicalAdultEducational MeasurementFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAcademic performanceActive learningGamificationKahootMedical educationRadiation oncologyTikTok

Identifiers

PMID39969776
PMCPMC12717108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.