ArticleInternational journal of hematology2025
Karyotype evolution of myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia with TP53 mutations.
Article in International journal of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Myelodysplastic syndrome progress to acute myeloid leukemia: new insights and updates.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Karyotype evolution of multiple myeloma.Journal of clinical and experimental hematopathology : JCEH · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To clarify karyotype evolution of myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia with TP53 mutations (MDS/AML-TP53), we analyzed G-banding of bone marrow aspiration samples of eight patients with MDS/AML-TP53 and visualized the evolutions as phylogenetic trees. With very few exceptions, the initial roots of these trees and all branches longitudinally had -5/5q- and -7/7q- in common. Time series data of the karyotypes obtained in six patients showed highly complex karyotype evolutions, such as combined branched, linear, parallel, and macro-evolutions. In two patients, numerous branches appeared as the initial transformation. As for aneuploidy, chromosome loss was more common than chromosome gain as previously reported. Structural and numerical chromosomal abnormalities were often deleted as karyotype evolution progressed. Among these karyotype evolutions, loss of translocated chromosomes with break sites at or near the centromeres frequently caused monosomies of two chromosomes involved in the translocation. G-banding enables analysis and visualization of karyotype evolutions as phylogenetic trees because it offers the properties of both single-cell and whole-chromosome analysis. Our research has led us to propose G-banding as a new interpretation method for classical karyotype analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39969773What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.