ArticlePurinergic signalling2025
SCH58261 effectively prevents the reduction in excitability of striatal MSNs in mice following 20 h of sleep deprivation.
Article in Purinergic signalling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Editorial: Purinergic signalling-a perspective from China (II).Purinergic signalling · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adenosine, a sleep-associated neuromodulator, is crucial in various physiological and pathological processes. Previous studies have demonstrated that sleep deprivation (SD) alters striatal neuronal activity. In this study, we used in vitro electrophysiological recordings to investigate the effects of 20 h of SD on the neuronal excitability of mouse dorsal striatal medium spiny neurons (MSNs). Our findings revealed that SD resulted in altered action potential (AP) discharge properties and reduced neuronal excitability compared to the control group. Importantly, these changes were partially offset by the prophylactic injection of the A2A receptor (A2AR) antagonist SCH58261. Additionally, 20 h of SD caused a decrease in the amplitude and an increase in the interval of spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic currents (sEPSCs) compared to control. However, the prophylactic injection of the A2AR antagonism shortened the sEPSC interval, while the A1 receptor (A1R) antagonist DPCPX not only shortened the interval but also further reduced the amplitude of sEPSCs. Thus, it can be concluded that SCH58261 effectively prevents the reduction in excitability of striatal MSNs in mice following 20 h of sleep deprivation, whereas DPCPX does not.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.