ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Plasma proteins mediate the effects of the gut microbiota on the development of head and neck cancer: a two-sample and mediated Mendelian randomized study.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genetically Predicted Gut Microbiota in Correlation with the Risk of Head and Neck Cancer.Cancer informatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough previous observational studies have highlighted a possible association between the gut microbiota (GM) and head and neck cancer (HNC), the causal relationships remain unclear, particularly regarding the role of plasma proteins as potential mediators. Clarifying these connections is essential for uncovering the underlying mechanisms of HNC progression and may lead to new therapeutic strategies. MATERIALS AND
methodsFirst, we examined the causal link between the GM and HNC via a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach. We then investigated the causative relationships between plasma proteins and HNC via the same two-sample MR technique. The coefficient product approach was then used to clarify the role of plasma proteins in the causative pathway between the GM and HNC. Finally, sensitivity investigations were performed to assess the robustness and coherence of the results.
resultsMR analyses revealed the protective effects of one family and six genera on HNC (Lachnospiraceae, Parabacteroides, Phascolarctobacterium, Alistipes, Sutterella, Roseburia and Alloprevotella). In contrast, three genera (Ruminococcus, Prevotella and Bacteroides) were significantly positively associated with HNC risk. Through further examination, researchers discovered 18 plasma proteins that have a causal relationship with HNC. Notably, the mediation MR illustrated that the causal protective effect of OTU97_86 (Phascolarctobacterium) on HNC (total effect IVW: OR = 0.879, 95% = 0.810-0.954, p = 0.002) was mediated by Proteasome subunit alpha type-1 (PSMA1) (- 0.020, 95% CI = - 0.039 ~ - 0.001, p = 0.036), accounting for 15.25% of the total effect. Similarly, the causal effect of OTU99_35 (Ruminococcus) on HNC risk (total effect IVW: OR = 1.109, 95% CI = 1.027-1.198, p = 0.008) was mediated by the protein FAM107B (0.015, 95% CI = 0.001-0.029, p = 0.031), accounting for 14.69% of the total effect.
conclusionMR and mediation analysis revealed that specific GMs influence HNC risk through plasma proteins: Phascolarctobacterium protects against HNC via PSMA1, whereas Ruminococcus increases HNC risk through FAM107B. These pathways suggest that Phascolarctobacterium is a potential preventative factor and that Ruminococcus is a risk factor. This highlights the possibility of using specific GM and plasma proteins as biomarkers or therapeutic targets for HNC prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.