Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39969697›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2025

Machine Learning Approaches to Prognostication in Traumatic Brain Injury.

Neeraj Badjatia, Jamie Podell, Ryan B Felix, Lujie Karen Chen, Kenneth Dalton, Tina I Wang, Shiming Yang, Peter Hu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Neeraj BadjatiaProgram in Trauma, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. nbadjatia@som.umaryland.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1509-9034
Jamie PodellProgram in Trauma, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ryan B FelixProgram in Trauma, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5375-1313
Lujie Karen ChenDepartment of Information Systems, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7185-8405
Kenneth DaltonProgram in Trauma, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Tina I WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3237-1693
Shiming YangProgram in Trauma, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0338-4268
Peter HuProgram in Trauma, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7332-758X

Funding

Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs W81XWH-24-CCCRP1Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency HR001122S0043RITMO-PA-006U.S. Department of Defense MTEC - 20 - 13 - IMAS - 006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review investigates the use of machine learning (ML) in prognosticating outcomes for traumatic brain injury (TBI). It underscores the benefits of ML models in processing and integrating complex, multimodal data-including clinical, imaging, and physiological inputs-to identify intricate non-linear relationships that traditional methods might overlook. RECENT

findingsML algorithms of clinical features, neuroimaging, and metrics from the autonomic nervous system enhance the early detection of clinical deterioration and improve outcome prediction. Challenges persist, including issues of data variability, model interpretability, and overfitting. However, advancements in model standardization and validation are key to enhancing their clinical applicability. ML-based, multimodal approaches offer transformative potential for personalized treatment planning and patient management. Future directions include integrating digital twins and real-time continuous data analysis, reinforcing the idea that comprehensive data amalgamation is essential for precise, adaptive prognostication and decision-making in neurocritical care, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticMachine LearningHumansNeuroimagingPrognosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.