Trial reportInternational journal of clinical oncology2025
Efficacy and safety of diffusing alpha-emitter radiation therapy (DaRT) for head and neck cancer recurrence after radiotherapy.
Trial report in International journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and Dosimetric Characterization of an In Vitro Benchtop Americium 241 Alpha Irradiator Platform.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of diffusing alpha-emitter radiation therapy (DaRT) for recurrent head and neck cancer (rHNC) after radiotherapy.
methodsThis study was a multicenter prospective clinical trial. Eligibility criteria included all patients with biopsy-proven rHNC and history of radiotherapy. The efficacy of DaRT was evaluated in terms of tumor shrinkage after 10 weeks of DaRT seed implantation. To assess safety of DaRT, radioactivity levels in blood and urine were measured, and incidence and grade of adverse events (AEs) were evaluated.
resultsBetween 2019 and 2021, DaRT was performed in 11 patients and completed in 10 patients with 11 tumors. The tumor sites included the tongue (n = 3), buccal mucosa (2), lips (2), floor of the mouth (1), soft palate (1), nose (1), and subcutaneous layer (1). Nine tumors were confirmed to be squamous cell carcinoma, and the remaining two tumors were basal cell carcinoma and neuroblastoma. Complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) were observed in three and six patients, respectively. The response rate was 81.8%. The maximum average radioactivity levels in blood and urine were 42.5 Bq/cm
conclusionThe initial response of rHNC after radiotherapy to DaRT was favorable, and the incidence and grade of AEs were acceptable, as compared to existing therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.