Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39969667›Full record

GuidelineGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2025

Guidelines for preoperative pulmonary function assessment in patients with lung cancer who will undergo surgery (The Japanese Association for Chest Surgery).

Yasuhisa Ohde, Kazuhiro Ueda, Jiro Okami, Hajime Saito, Toshihiko Sato, Eiji Yatsuyanagi, Masanori Tsuchida, Takahiro Mimae, Hiroyuki Adachi, Tomoyuki Hishida and 3 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yasuhisa OhdeDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Kazuhiro UedaDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan.
Jiro OkamiDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Hajime SaitoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Iwate Medical University, Iwate, Japan.
Toshihiko SatoDepartment of General Thoracic, Breast and Pediatric Surgery, Fukuoka University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.
Eiji YatsuyanagiDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, National Hospital Organization Obihiro Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan.
Masanori TsuchidaDivision of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan. masatsu@med.niigata-u.ac.jp.
Takahiro MimaeDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Hiroyuki AdachiDepartment of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Kanagawa, Japan.
Tomoyuki HishidaDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hisashi SajiDepartment of Chest Surgery, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan. hisashisaji@gmail.com.
Ichiro YoshinoInternational University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Narita, Japan.
Committee for Guideline Assessment, The Japanese Association for Chest Surgery, Tokyo, Japan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article translates the guidelines for preoperative pulmonary function assessment in patients with lung cancer who will undergo surgery, established by the Japanese Association of Chest Surgery on May 17, 2021, from Japanese to English. The last version of these guidelines was created on April 5, 2011. Over the past decade, changes in clinical practice have occurred that do not align with the current guidelines, prompting a revision in conjunction with the introduction of new evidence this time. This guideline was developed with reference to the internationally adopted GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system. Extraction of evidence, systematic review, and quality assessment are entrusted to each guideline review committee and the Pulmonary Function Assessment Working Group. Committee members are also responsible for determining the selection of evidence and the extraction period, with a particular emphasis on adopting items considered to be of special importance. The recommended assessment and management is categorized into a general overview, pulmonary function assessment, cardiopulmonary exercise test, pulmonary function assessment for lung cancer with interstitial pneumonia, preoperative smoking cessation, and pulmonary rehabilitation. These are described by the strength of recommendation, the strength of evidence, and the consensus rate.

Indexed as

LungLung NeoplasmsPneumonectomyPreoperative CareRespiratory Function TestsEast Asian PeopleExercise TestHumansJapanPredictive Value of TestsSmoking CessationLung resectionNon-small cell lung cancerPreoperative assessmentTolerability

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.