ReviewCurrent HIV/AIDS reports2025
Promises, Pitfalls, and Progress: Doxycycline Prophylaxis for Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Infections.
Review in Current HIV/AIDS reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewDoxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (doxy PEP) has proven to be highly effective in reducing the incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women. In response, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued official clinical guidance on the use of doxy PEP as a preventive intervention in these populations. However, despite strong evidence supporting its use, the potential risks of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) along with its limited accessibility in other key populations, remain significant concerns with doxy PEP. RECENT
findingsReal-world data show strong awareness, interest, and usage of doxy PEP among MSM and transwomen. Early ecological studies have revealed population-level reductions in chlamydia and early syphilis incidence following doxy PEP implementation. Ongoing research continues to explore its efficacy in other populations, as well as its impact on both individual and population-level AMR. Doxy PEP is a well-tolerated and inexpensive intervention that has the potential to substantially reduce bacterial STIs, particularly in priority populations. Its implementation will require careful assessment of equitable uptake, usage patterns, and long-term monitoring of STI incidence and AMR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39969650What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.