Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39969650›Full record

ReviewCurrent HIV/AIDS reports2025

Promises, Pitfalls, and Progress: Doxycycline Prophylaxis for Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Infections.

Christopher J Kaperak, John M Flores, Aniruddha Hazra

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current HIV/AIDS reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher J KaperakSection of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC5065, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
John M FloresSection of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC5065, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Aniruddha HazraSection of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC5065, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. ahazra2@bsd.uchicago.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8557-4465

Funding

HRSA HHS T32HP42019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewDoxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (doxy PEP) has proven to be highly effective in reducing the incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women. In response, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued official clinical guidance on the use of doxy PEP as a preventive intervention in these populations. However, despite strong evidence supporting its use, the potential risks of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) along with its limited accessibility in other key populations, remain significant concerns with doxy PEP. RECENT

findingsReal-world data show strong awareness, interest, and usage of doxy PEP among MSM and transwomen. Early ecological studies have revealed population-level reductions in chlamydia and early syphilis incidence following doxy PEP implementation. Ongoing research continues to explore its efficacy in other populations, as well as its impact on both individual and population-level AMR. Doxy PEP is a well-tolerated and inexpensive intervention that has the potential to substantially reduce bacterial STIs, particularly in priority populations. Its implementation will require careful assessment of equitable uptake, usage patterns, and long-term monitoring of STI incidence and AMR.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDoxycyclinePost-Exposure ProphylaxisSexually Transmitted Diseases, BacterialFemaleHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleTransgender PersonsUnited StatesAnti-Bacterial AgentsDoxycyclineChlamydiaDoxycyclineGonorrheaProphylaxisSexually transmitted infectionsSyphilis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.