ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2025
Computed libraries of avobenzone derivatives with sulfur groups as enhanced UVA filters.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextSunscreen formulations often contain avobenzone as a UVA filter to combat the deleterious effects of solar UV radiation. Avobenzone has notable drawbacks: (1) photounstability under UV radiation/sunlight and (2) tendency for skin penetration. The current report aims to improve both the intrinsic photostability and decrease the skin permeability of avobenzone through skeleton structure modification. The electron-donating -OMe group of avobenzone was replaced with diverse groups to compute molecular libraries of avobenzone derivatives. The studies were focused on the sulfur electron-withdrawing groups of avobenzone derivatives as the photostable UV filters contain -SO
methodsA total of 2468 avobenzone derivatives were computed using the enumeration tool of the Schrödinger Material Suite platform. Searching for sulfur-containing derivatives yielded a total of 72 molecules, 23 of which exhibited electron-withdrawing properties. These molecules were evaluated for their UVA spectra using TDDFT with the B3LYP functional and a 6-311G + ** basis set. The bond dissociation energy for putative Norrish type I cleavages was calculated using the B3LYP functional in combination with the LACV3P** basis set. The membrane dG insert was calculated using the membrane permeability panel. The maximum transdermal transportation rate (Jm) was derived using the QikProp tool. These results indicate that avobenzone derivatives with sulfonic acid, sulfuric diamide, and sulfonamide functional groups demonstrated improved photochemical properties with a significant reduction in skin permeability compared to the native avobenzone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39969645What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.