ReviewNeurosurgical review2025
Ankylosing spondylitis: special considerations and clinical outcomes in surgical management of spinal fractures, case series and analysis of twenty patients.
Review in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) is a systemic inflammatory disease that involves the axial skeleton the most. It causes ascending inflammation and, thus, rigidity in the spinal column, from the sacroiliac joint to the cervical region. Spinal column deformities, besides vulnerability to trauma, alter the patients' quality of life and put their neural elements a great risk. In this study, we reviewed data of twenty AS patients who underwent spinal surgery due to trauma and spinal deformity due to AS, over 12 years in our center. Spinal radiologic indices, besides clinical evaluation of quality of life and neurologic status, were reviewed and mentioned. AS patients who were operated due to severe deformity and instability, correction of spinopelvic indices correlated with significant improvement in their quality of life and pain scores. Among those who were operated due to fracture and/or neurologic damage, clinical and neurologic improvement was significant. Spinal trauma and mal-alignment is AS, correlates with neurological compromise, and clinical symptoms such as pain and gait disturbance. Near complete correction of these indices improves patients' quality of life. Traumatic spinal fractures in AS, should be considered unstable unless otherwise proved. Meticulous surgical stabilization in such cases usually indicates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39969602What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.