Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39969554›Full record

Trial reportEuropean radiology2025

A randomised controlled trial comparing three clinical administration strategies in spectral detector CT pulmonary angiography with low contrast medium dose.

Cathrine Helgestad Kristiansen, Owen Thomas, Anton Bengt Nyquist, Audun Sanderud, Joao Boavida, Jonn Terje Geitung, Thien Trung Tran, Peter Mæhre Lauritzen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cathrine Helgestad KristiansenDepartment of Life Sciences and Health, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway. cathrine.helgestad.kristiansen@ahus.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8591-8029
Owen ThomasHealth Services Research Department (HØKH), Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Anton Bengt NyquistDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Intervention, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Audun SanderudDecommissioning Department, Norwegian Nuclear Decommissioning, Halden, Norway.
Joao BoavidaDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Nordland Hospital, Bodø, Norway.
Jonn Terje GeitungDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Intervention, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Thien Trung TranDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Intervention, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Peter Mæhre LauritzenDepartment of Life Sciences and Health, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare vascular attenuation (VA) with three strategies for administering a low contrast medium (CM) dose in dual-layer spectral detector CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA).

methodsPatients were prospectively randomised into control- or one of two experimental groups. Control group patients received CM (350 mgI/mL) diluted 1:1 with saline. Experimental group B received CM (350 mgI/mL) with low flow. Experimental group C received CM with low concentration (140 mgI/mL). Virtual monoenergetic images at 40 and 55 kiloelectron Volt (keV) were reconstructed. Objective examination quality (OEQ) i.e., VA, noise, and signal-to-noise ratio, was measured and subjective examination quality (SEQ) was rated at three anatomical levels: in the pulmonary trunk (PT), the interlobar arteries and the posterior basal segmental arteries. PRIMARY OUTCOME: VA in PT at 40 keV. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: OEQ and SEQ across all anatomic levels.

resultsA total of 328 patients were randomised. 112 vs 115 and 101 were analysed in the control (A) vs experimental groups (B and C), respectively. There were no differences in VA in PT between the groups: A vs B (p = 0.96), B vs C (p = 0.14), and A vs C (p = 0.18). Group C showed higher VA across all anatomical levels. There were no differences in SEQ.

conclusionThere was no difference in the attenuation in the PT between the dilution-, low flow-, and low concentration groups. However, the low concentration group showed higher attenuation in the pulmonary arteries when all anatomical levels were assessed. KEY POINTS: Question Contrast medium reduction may be accomplished with dilution, low flow, or low concentration. However, the effect of the different strategies on vascular attenuation is unknown. Findings There was no difference in pulmonary trunk attenuation between the three strategies on spectral detector CT pulmonary angiography. Clinical relevance Low contrast medium dose spectral detector CT pulmonary angiography may be implemented with the administration strategy of the unit's own choice.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyContrast MediaPulmonary ArteryPulmonary EmbolismAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSignal-To-Noise RatioContrast MediaAdministration and dosageComputed tomography angiographyContrast mediaImage enhancementPulmonary embolism

Identifiers

PMID39969554
PMCPMC12226604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.