ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025
Accessible LED Lightbox for Light-induced Retinal Damage in Pigmented Mice.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- High-Resolution Imaging and Interpretation of Three-Dimensional RPE Sheet Structure.Biomolecules · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To design and validate a cost-effective and titratable system capable of light-induced photoreceptor dysfunction and damage in pigmented mice. Methods: Two commonly used mouse strains in vision research, C57BL/6J and 129SVE mice, were exposed individually to varying light intensities in custom-designed boxes. Visual function was assessed by ERG, which was conducted two days prior, one day, and one week after light exposure. For morphological evaluation of photoreceptor health, we stained retinal sections with hematoxylin and eosin followed by light microscopy. Photoreceptor nuclei were quantified at equidistant points across the entire retina. Results: C57BL/6J and 129SVE mice exhibited a significant reduction in visual function 1 day after exposure to light at varying light intensities from 10 to 60 klx for 4 hours. We observed a loss in visual function 1 day after exposure that correlated with the light intensity. The visual function did not recover even at 7 days after exposure. We observed loss of photoreceptor nuclei with regional differences in susceptibility to light damage, with the central retina being more affected than the periphery. Conclusions: The lightbox system we developed effectively reduced visual function in pigmented animals after 4 hours of light exposure. Additionally, the system is flexible; the intensity and duration of light exposure can be adjusted to induce a desired level of light-induced photoreceptor dysfunction and damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.