ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025
Clinical, Genetic, Imaging and Electrophysiological Findings in a Cohort of Patients With GUCA1A-Associated Retinopathy.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To report findings in GUCA1A-associated retinopathy, a rare autosomal-dominant retinopathy. Methods: Clinical features and investigations from molecularly confirmed patients at a large referral center were analyzed (retrospective cohort study). Results: Nineteen patients (14 families), with five different variants, were included: p.(Tyr99Cys) in 10 families and p.(Leu84Phe), p.(Ile107Thr), p.(Glu111Ala), and p.(leu176Phe) in 1 family each. Mean (SD) ages at first and last visits were 38 (17) and 48 (15) years, respectively. Mean (SD) logMAR visual acuities at the first and last visits were 0.67 (0.61) and 0.94 (0.58) for right eyes and 0.63 (0.63) and 0.95 (0.74) for left eyes. Acuities ranged from 0.00 logMAR to no light perception. Most described progressive problems with central and color vision. Across 144 patient visits, logMAR acuity correlated with age (Spearman coefficients of 0.43 and 0.54 for right and left eyes, P < 0.001), with a high interocular correlation (coefficient 0.90, P < 0.001). Optical coherence tomography showed irregularity and then loss of the central ellipsoid zone. Ultra-widefield imaging showed peripheral degeneration in some patients. Electrophysiology (n = 13) was consistent with cone dystrophy (n = 11) or macular dystrophy (n = 2). Compared with the common p.(Tyr99Cys) variant, patients with p.(Glu111Ala) (n = 2) had worse vision; those with p.(Leu84Phe) (n = 3) were younger with earlier-onset visual loss. Patients with p.(Ile107Thr) (n = 2) showed later presentation, with milder acuity reduction. Conclusions: We present genotypic and phenotypic findings from the largest cohort with GUCA1A retinopathy. Most had progressive visual loss and electrophysiologic evidence of cone dystrophy. Possible genotype-phenotype correlations emerged, but subgroups were small for four of five variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.