Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39969277›Full record

ArticleRadiology. Artificial intelligence2025

Evaluating Skellytour for Automated Skeleton Segmentation from Whole-Body CT Images.

Daniel C Mann, Michael W Rutherford, Phillip Farmer, Joshua M Eichhorn, Fathima Fijula Palot Manzil, Christopher P Wardell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology. Artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel C MannDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W Markham St, Little Rock, AR 72205.ORCID 0000-0002-6260-8615
Michael W RutherfordDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W Markham St, Little Rock, AR 72205.ORCID 0000-0003-2665-753X
Phillip FarmerDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W Markham St, Little Rock, AR 72205.ORCID 0000-0003-1448-1346
Joshua M EichhornDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W Markham St, Little Rock, AR 72205.ORCID 0000-0001-5351-5081
Fathima Fijula Palot ManzilDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W Markham St, Little Rock, AR 72205.ORCID 0000-0002-4042-5383
Christopher P WardellDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W Markham St, Little Rock, AR 72205.ORCID 0000-0002-9416-7818

Funding

Understanding the Negative Prognostic Impact of Intraosseous Focal Lesions in Multiple MyelomaP20GM125503 · NIGMS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI Sanja Novak · 2018 to 2026
$23.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM125503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose To construct and evaluate the performance of a machine learning model for bone segmentation using whole-body CT images. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, whole-body CT scans (from June 2010 to January 2018) from 90 patients (mean age, 61 years ± 9 [SD]; 45 male, 45 female) with multiple myeloma were manually segmented using 60 labels and subsegmented into cortical and trabecular bone. Segmentations were verified by board-certified radiology and nuclear medicine physicians. The impacts of isotropy, resolution, multiple labeling schemes, and postprocessing were assessed. Model performance was assessed on internal and external test datasets (362 scans) and benchmarked against the TotalSegmentator segmentation model. Performance was assessed using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), normalized surface distance (NSD), and manual inspection. Results Skellytour achieved consistently high segmentation performance on the internal dataset (DSC: 0.94, NSD: 0.99) and two external datasets (DSC: 0.94, 0.96; NSD: 0.999, 1.0), outperforming TotalSegmentator on the first two datasets. Subsegmentation performance was also high (DSC: 0.95, NSD: 0.995). Skellytour produced finely detailed segmentations, even in low-density bones. Conclusion The study demonstrates that Skellytour is an accurate and generalizable bone segmentation and subsegmentation model for CT data; it is available as a Python package via GitHub

Indexed as

Bone and BonesImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningMultiple MyelomaRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedWhole Body ImagingAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesComparative StudiesConvolutional Neural Network (CNN)CTDemineralization-BoneInformaticsSegmentationSkeletal-AxialSupervised Learning

Identifiers

PMID39969277
PMCPMC11950879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.