ArticleRadiology. Artificial intelligence2025
Evaluating Skellytour for Automated Skeleton Segmentation from Whole-Body CT Images.
Article in Radiology. Artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction of musculoskeletal quantitative model based on deep learning and study of musculoskeletal relationship in patients with osteoporosis.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- Anticipating femoral shaft nonunion at 1-3 months: a multimodal framework with automated X‑ray segmentation despite metal implants.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Healing of lytic lesions and restoration of bone health in multiple myeloma through sclerostin inhibition.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2025Article
- Bone Appetit: Skellytour Sets the Table for Robust Skeletal Segmentation.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose To construct and evaluate the performance of a machine learning model for bone segmentation using whole-body CT images. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, whole-body CT scans (from June 2010 to January 2018) from 90 patients (mean age, 61 years ± 9 [SD]; 45 male, 45 female) with multiple myeloma were manually segmented using 60 labels and subsegmented into cortical and trabecular bone. Segmentations were verified by board-certified radiology and nuclear medicine physicians. The impacts of isotropy, resolution, multiple labeling schemes, and postprocessing were assessed. Model performance was assessed on internal and external test datasets (362 scans) and benchmarked against the TotalSegmentator segmentation model. Performance was assessed using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), normalized surface distance (NSD), and manual inspection. Results Skellytour achieved consistently high segmentation performance on the internal dataset (DSC: 0.94, NSD: 0.99) and two external datasets (DSC: 0.94, 0.96; NSD: 0.999, 1.0), outperforming TotalSegmentator on the first two datasets. Subsegmentation performance was also high (DSC: 0.95, NSD: 0.995). Skellytour produced finely detailed segmentations, even in low-density bones. Conclusion The study demonstrates that Skellytour is an accurate and generalizable bone segmentation and subsegmentation model for CT data; it is available as a Python package via GitHub
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.