Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39969063›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2025

Impact of local unfolding fluctuations on the evolution of regional sequence preferences in proteins.

Keila Voortman-Sheetz, James O Wrabl, Vincent J Hilser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Keila Voortman-SheetzDepartment of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
James O WrablDepartment of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7679-0158
Vincent J HilserDepartment of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7173-0073

Funding

Thermodynamics of Protein FluctuationsR01GM063747 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI HILSER, VINCENT J. · 2001 to 2023
$7.9M
Folding and Chaperone Interactions of Multi-domain ProteinsR01GM121567 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HILSER, VINCENT J. · 2017 to 2025
$3.2M
The Chemistry-Biology Interface Program at Johns Hopkins UniversityT32GM149382 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI STEVEN E ROKITA · 2023 to 2026
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM063747NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM121567NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM149382NIH HHS NIHR01GM121567NIH HHS NIHR01GM63747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of distinct structural environments in the proteome (as observed in the Protein Data Bank) may belie an organizing framework, whereby evolution conserves the relative stability of different sequence segments, regardless of the specific structural details present in the final fold. If true, the question arises as to whether the energetic consequences of amino acid substitutions, and thus the frequencies of amino acids within each of these so-called thermodynamic environments, could depend less on what local structure that sequence segment may adopt in the final fold, and more on the local stability of that final structure relative to the unfolded state. To address this question, a previously described ensemble-based approach (the COREX algorithm) was used to define proteins in terms of thermodynamic environments, and the naturally occurring frequencies of amino acids within these environments were used to generate statistical energies (a type of knowledge-based potential). By comparing compatibility scores from the statistical energies with energies calculated using the Rosetta all-atom energy function, we assessed the information overlap between the two approaches. Results revealed a substantial correlation between the statistical scores and those obtained using Rosetta, directly demonstrating that a small number of thermodynamic environments are sufficient to capture the perceived multiplicity of different structural environments in proteins. More importantly, the agreement suggests that regional amino acid distributions within each protein in any proteome have been substantially driven by the evolutionary conservation of the regional differences in stabilities within protein families.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularProteinsProtein UnfoldingAlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceDatabases, ProteinProtein ConformationProtein FoldingThermodynamicsProteinsconformational specificityenergy landscapeensemble‐based thermodynamicshorizontal conservationprotein stability

Identifiers

PMID39969063
PMCPMC11837041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.