ArticleRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2025
Validation of the reduced version of the Brazilian Scale of Moral Distress in Nurses.
Article in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Moral distress among physicians and nursing staff in surgical settings: a comparative study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveto validate a model of the reduced version of the Brazilian Scale of Moral Distress in Nurses.
methodmethodological study, with a sample of 269 nurses from a public university hospital in southern Brazil. A sociodemographic questionnaire and the Brazilian Moral Distress Scale for Nurses were used. Descriptive statistics, structural equation modeling, and invariance analysis between age groups were used.
resultsregarding profile, professionals aged between 31 and 40, women, married, and specialists prevailed. The structural model fitted the data with acceptable fit indices. The proposed model showed excellent internal consistency, convergent validity, and discriminant validity. The analysis of the structural model revealed that the five hypotheses were confirmed, and the invariance between the age groups indicates that the way the variables are conceptualized, measured, and interrelated in the model does not affect the results, regardless of the groups compared.
conclusionthe scale achieved satisfactory psychometric indicators, proving to be suitable for use, maintaining the relevant validation elements per dimension, and offering practical advantages. Further research is suggested to deepen our understanding of the consequences of moral distress and to develop effective strategies for managing it.
background(1)The reduced version of the EDME-BR consisted of 24 questions and six factors. (2)Analysis of invariance and structural equation modeling were used for validation. (3)Internal consistency and composite reliability values were adequate. (4)The tests indicated sufficient predictive relevance of the proposed model. (5)The reduced scale offers a clear, accessible approach with a shorter response time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.