Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39968956›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

Catalytic growth in a shared enzyme pool ensures robust control of centrosome size.

Deb Sankar Banerjee, Shiladitya Banerjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Allocation of resources among multiple daughter cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Deb Sankar BanerjeeDepartment of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4452-7982
Shiladitya BanerjeeDepartment of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8000-2556

Funding

Biophysical models and mechanisms for cellular adaptation to environmental stressR35GM143042 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BANERJEE, SHILADITYA · 2021 to 2025
$1.6M
National Science Foundation NSF MCB-2203601NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM143042NIH HHS NIH R35 GM143042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate regulation of centrosome size is essential for ensuring error-free cell division, and dysregulation of centrosome size has been linked to various pathologies, including developmental defects and cancer. While a universally accepted model for centrosome size regulation is lacking, prior theoretical and experimental works suggest a centrosome growth model involving autocatalytic assembly of the pericentriolar material. Here, we show that the autocatalytic assembly model fails to explain the attainment of equal centrosome sizes, which is crucial for error-free cell division. Incorporating latest experimental findings into the molecular mechanisms governing centrosome assembly, we introduce a new quantitative theory for centrosome growth involving catalytic assembly within a shared pool of enzymes. Our model successfully achieves robust size equality between maturing centrosome pairs, mirroring cooperative growth dynamics observed in experiments. To validate our theoretical predictions, we compare them with available experimental data and demonstrate the broad applicability of the catalytic growth model across different organisms, which exhibit distinct growth dynamics and size scaling characteristics.

Indexed as

CentrosomeAnimalsCell DivisionHumansModels, Biologicalcatalytic growthC. eleganscell biologycentrosome maturationcentrosome sizecooperative growthD. melanogasterpericentriolar materialphysics of living systemstheory and modeling

Identifiers

PMID39968956
PMCPMC11839165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.