Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39968848›Full record

ArticleJournal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine2025

Differences in the Sonographic Features of Adenomyosis and Concurrent Endometriosis Compared to Isolated Adenomyosis: A MUSA Criteria Analysis.

Ran Matot, Ophir Blickstein, Gideon Leibner, Uval Bar-Peled, Adi Borovich, Yossi Geron, Yinon Gilboa, Haim Krissi, Sharon Perlman

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ran MatotHelen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3237-1696
Ophir BlicksteinHelen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.
Gideon LeibnerThe Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Uval Bar-PeledThe Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Adi BorovichHelen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.
Yossi GeronHelen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5953-1496
Yinon GilboaHelen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.
Haim KrissiHelen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.
Sharon PerlmanHelen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8023-0679

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine whether the co-occurrence of endometriosis affects the sonographic features of adenomyosis based on the revised Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) criteria.

methodsThis prospective cohort study utilized data from a tertiary referral center collected between 2010 and 2022. Non-pregnant women aged 20-53 years who presented with symptoms potentially related to adenomyosis and underwent pelvic ultrasound scans were included. Diagnoses were based on the revised MUSA criteria, which distinguish between direct features (endometrial cysts, hyperechogenic islands, echogenic sub-endometrial lines, and buds) and indirect features (globular shape of the uterus, asymmetrical uterine wall thickening, irregular junctional zone, fan-shaped shadowing, translesional vascularity, and interrupted junctional zone). Patients were categorized into 2 groups: 1) concurrent adenomyosis and endometriosis and 2) isolated adenomyosis. Demographic and clinical characteristics were retrospectively collected.

resultsNinety-four patients were diagnosed with adenomyosis. Of these, 24 (27%) had concurrent endometriosis, while 70 had isolated adenomyosis. The most frequent sonographic features were globular uterine configuration (52%), myometrial cysts (44%), and asymmetrical myometrial thickening (33%). The isolated adenomyosis group had a higher proportion of direct features (29%) and both direct and indirect features (33%) compared to the concurrent group, which predominantly exhibited indirect features (71%) (P < .05). Direct features of myometrial cysts were significantly more frequent in the isolated adenomyosis group (51%) compared to the concurrent group (21%, P = .01).

conclusionsUtilizing the revised MUSA criteria revealed significant differences in the sonographic features of adenomyosis in symptomatic patients with concurrent endometriosis compared to isolated adenomyosis. This highlights the necessity for standardized diagnostic methods and enhances understanding of the complex relationship between adenomyosis and endometriosis, underscoring the importance of accurate diagnosis in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AdenomyosisEndometriosisAdultCohort StudiesDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesUltrasonographyUterusYoung Adultadenomyosisendometriosisgynecological imagingMUSA criteriatransvaginal ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID39968848
PMCPMC12067169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.