ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2025
Investigating Multiple Mediators to Mitigate Socioeconomic Differences in Patient-Reported Outcomes After Stroke: A Nationwide Register-Based Study.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of causal pathways of socioeconomic inequalities in stroke.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2026Pooled it
- Bayesian mediation analysis using patient-reported outcomes from AI chatbots to infer causal pathways in clinical trials.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSubstantial socioeconomic differences in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) 3 months after stroke have recently been shown. We aimed to understand the underlying mechanisms and investigate potential interventional targets to equalize differences.
methodsAll patients aged 18 to 64 years, independent in activities of daily living, registered with a first-time stroke in Riksstroke (the Swedish Stroke Register) from 2015 to 2017 were included. PROMs 3 months after stroke included activities of daily living status, mood, fatigue, pain, and general health. Socioeconomic status (SES) was measured on the basis of income and education. Using causal mediation analysis, we simulated the effect of interventions on the distributions of smoking, metabolic health (diabetes, antihypertensive treatment, statin treatment), atrial fibrillation, and stroke characteristics (stroke type, severity) on the absolute SES-related risk difference in PROMs.
resultsOf 6910 patients, 8% had become dependent in activities of daily living, 13% reported low mood, 42% fatigue, 23% pain, and 17% poor general health 3 months after stroke. Adjusted for sex and age, low SES was associated with increased absolute risks of poor PROMs with between 6% and 18% compared with higher SES with the largest increase for general health (18.2% [95% CI, 13.5%-22.9%]). Intervening to shift the distribution of all mediators among patients with low SES to those of patients with higher SES potentially reduces SES disparities by a proportion of 14% to 45%. For most PROMs the most important intervention was reducing smoking and improving metabolic health.
conclusionsWorking-age patients with low SES report more severe outcomes 3 months after stroke than patients with higher SES. Targeted interventions reducing the prevalence of smoking, diabetes, hypertension, and high cholesterol in patients with low SES could mitigate these disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.