Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39968723›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2026

A structural mean modeling Mendelian randomization approach to investigate the lifecourse effect of adiposity: applied and methodological considerations.

Grace M Power, Tom Palmer, Nicole Warrington, Jon Heron, Tom G Richardson, Vanessa Didelez, Kate Tilling, George Davey Smith, Eleanor Sanderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Grace M PowerMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5702-7728
Tom PalmerMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Nicole WarringtonInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Jon HeronMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Tom G RichardsonMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Vanessa DidelezStatistical Methods in Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
Kate TillingMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
George Davey SmithMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Eleanor SandersonMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5188-5775

Funding

German Research Foundation 459360854Medical Research Council and the University of Bristol MC_UU_00032/1Medical Research Council and the University of Bristol MC_UU_00032/2Medical Research Council (MRC)/UKRI MR/N0137941/1National Health and Medical Research Council APP2008723
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mendelian randomization (MR) is a technique that uses genetic variation to address causal questions about how modifiable exposures influence health. For some time-varying phenotypes, genetic effects may have differential importance at different periods in the lifecourse. MR studies often employ conventional instrumental variable (IV) methods designed to estimate average lifetime effects. Recently, several extensions of MR have been proposed to investigate time-varying effects, including structural mean models (SMMs). SMMs exploit IVs through g-estimation and circumvent some of the parametric assumptions required by other MR methods. In this study, we applied g-estimation of SMMs within an MR framework to estimate the period effects of adiposity measured at two life stages, childhood and adulthood, on cardiovascular disease (CVD), type 2 diabetes (T2D), and breast cancer. We found persistent period effects of higher adulthood adiposity on increased risk of CVD and T2D. Higher childhood adiposity had a protective period effect on breast cancer risk. We compared this approach with an inverse variance weighted multivariable MR method, which also uses multiple IVs to assess time-varying effects but relies on a different set of assumptions. We highlight the strengths and limitations of each approach and conclude by emphasizing the importance of underlying methodological assumptions in the application of MR to lifecourse research.

Indexed as

AdiposityBreast NeoplasmsCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Mendelian Randomization AnalysisAdultChildFemaleHumansMaleModels, StatisticalRisk Factorsadipositycausal inference methodsgenetic epidemiologylifecoursetime-varying

Identifiers

PMID39968723
PMCPMC12780781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.