ArticleBiotechnology progress
Improving outcomes in intensified processing via optimization of the cell line development workflow.
Article in Biotechnology progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Improving outcomes in intensified processing via optimization of the cell line development workflow.Biotechnology progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the industry continues to explore the benefits of continuous and intensified manufacturing, it is important to assure that the cell line development (CLD) workflows in practice today are well suited to generate clones that meet the unique challenges associated with these processes. Most cell lines used in intensified processes are currently developed using traditional fed-batch CLD workflows followed by adaptation of these cell lines to perfusion processes. This method maybe suboptimal as fed-batch CLD workflows select clones which produce high volumetric titers irrespective of cell growth rate and specific productivity (qP). Although sufficient for fed-batch processes, performance of cells derived from this traditional CLD workflow may not be maintained in perfusion processes, where an intricate balance of performance parameters is needed. Until now, a thorough investigation into the effect of the CLD workflow on top clone performance in perfusion processes has not been conducted. Here, we show how the CLD workflow impacts cell performance in both fed-batch and perfusion processes, emphasizing the advantages of adopting a perfusion-specific CLD workflow which includes the use of medium specially designed for expansion and production in a perfusion setting, scale-down models which more accurately simulate perfusion process, and the adoption of perfusion-specific cell line selection criteria. Together, this results in the development of more efficient cell lines, fit for continuous and intensified processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.