Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39968623›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025

A marine predator relies on both social cues and frequently updated memory to search for prey.

Julien Collet, Andréa Thiebault, Anne-Sophie Bonnet-Lebrun, Yann Tremblay, Tegan Carpenter-Kling, Danielle Keys, Pierre Pistorius

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Marine radar reveals novel group foraging patterns in pelagic seabirds.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julien ColletDepartment of Zoology, Marine Apex Predator Research Unit, Institute for Coastal and Marine Research, Nelson Mandela University, Gqeberha 6031, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-3285-5535
Andréa ThiebaultDepartment of Zoology, Marine Apex Predator Research Unit, Institute for Coastal and Marine Research, Nelson Mandela University, Gqeberha 6031, South Africa.
Anne-Sophie Bonnet-LebrunCentre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, UMR7372 CNRS-La Rochelle Université, Villiers-en-Bois 79360, France.
Yann TremblayInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Research Unit UMR248 MARBEC (IRD, IFREMER, CNRS, University of Montpellier), 34203 Sète, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4653-9269
Tegan Carpenter-KlingDepartment of Zoology, Marine Apex Predator Research Unit, Institute for Coastal and Marine Research, Nelson Mandela University, Gqeberha 6031, South Africa.
Danielle KeysDepartment of Zoology, Marine Apex Predator Research Unit, Institute for Coastal and Marine Research, Nelson Mandela University, Gqeberha 6031, South Africa.
Pierre PistoriusDepartment of Zoology, Marine Apex Predator Research Unit, Institute for Coastal and Marine Research, Nelson Mandela University, Gqeberha 6031, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-6561-7069

Funding

Agence Nationale de la RechercheDST/NRF Centre of ExcellenceFrench National Research Institute for Sustainable DevelopmentInstitute for African OrnithologyNelson Mandela UniversitySouth African National Research Foundation (NRF)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Finding scattered resources is a challenge for marine predators, their search strategies shaping in turn their response to global changes. Three types of search strategies are generally considered: random opportunistic search, reliance on conspicuous social cues or long-term individual fidelity to predictably productive areas. More complex strategies, namely intermediate, composite and/or those varying across time and environmental conditions are likely to prevail but are rarely explored. We investigated memory strategies in Cape gannets, a marine predator heavily relying on social cues, and closely related to the northern gannet which shows long-term individual foraging fidelity. Repeat GPS tracks within seasons revealed that two different individuals leaving the colony more than 3 days apart showed random chances to forage in a similar direction, whereas within-individuals, birds persisted in a same direction for longer timescales, reaching random levels only after 10 days, or 9 consecutive trips. This strategy of transient individual preferences within a breeding season was observed in most individuals every year. These results suggest a consistent and complex search strategy mixing social cues and private information updated every few days. Our simple approach can readily be applied to other central place foragers to better understand the evolutionary ecology of search strategies.

Indexed as

BirdsCuesMemoryPredatory BehaviorAnimalsSeasonsSocial BehaviorCape gannets Morus capensisGPS trackingindividual foraging fidelitymarine top predatorsearch strategiessocial and private information

Identifiers

PMID39968623
PMCPMC11836699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.