Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39968521›Full record

ArticleMaterials today. Bio2025

Enhancing auricular reconstruction: A biomimetic scaffold with 3D-printed multiscale porous structure utilizing chondrogenic activity ink.

Yueying Kong, Zijing Lu, Jianan Zhan, Xi Zhou, Shenghua Chen, Qiwei Chen, Haihuan Gong, Xianlin Zhang, Xiaoyan Mao, Yilin Wang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials today. Bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yueying KongClinical Anatomy & Reproductive Medicine Application Institute, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, 421001, Hengyang, China.
Zijing LuDepartment of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Nanfan Hospital of Southern Medical University, No. 1838 N Guangzhou Rd, 510515, Guanzhou, China.
Jianan ZhanDepartment of Human Anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences Guangdong Medical University, 524000, Zhanjiang, China.
Xi ZhouGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Biomechanics, National Key Discipline of Human Anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, 510515, Guangzhou, China.
Shenghua ChenClinical Anatomy & Reproductive Medicine Application Institute, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, 421001, Hengyang, China.
Qiwei ChenGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Biomechanics, National Key Discipline of Human Anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, 510515, Guangzhou, China.
Haihuan GongDepartment of Periodontics, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine Affiliated Stomatology Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510182, China.
Xianlin ZhangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Biomechanics, National Key Discipline of Human Anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, 510515, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaoyan MaoDepartment of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Nanfan Hospital of Southern Medical University, No. 1838 N Guangzhou Rd, 510515, Guanzhou, China.
Yilin WangDepartment of Human Anatomy, College of Basic Medical Science, China Medical University, 110122, Shenyang, China.
Wenhua HuangClinical Anatomy & Reproductive Medicine Application Institute, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, 421001, Hengyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Auricular defects are highly prevalent and have a significant impact on the physical and mental well-being of patients. However, due to the intricate anatomy of the auricle, achieving personalized and precise reconstruction poses a major challenge. Currently, tissue engineering auricle scaffolds based on rigid materials are an effective therapeutic approach for auricle reconstruction. Nevertheless, these auricular scaffolds often fail to meet biomechanical requirements and lack biological activity, resulting in suboptimal treatment outcomes. In this study, polyvinyl alcohol and gelatin were used as printing inks, and nano-silica was employed as a filler to optimize the printability of the inks. Through layer-by-layer 3D printing, auricle scaffolds were fabricated that closely mimic human auricular biomechanical properties and possess a multi-scale pore structure. Subsequent in vitro experiments confirmed the biocompatibility of the scaffolds. Furthermore, a rabbit auricular cartilage defect model was established to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of this bionic scaffold featuring a multi-scale pore structure for auricle defects. The findings demonstrated that the developed auricle scaffold not only exhibited excellent biomechanical strength and favorable biocompatibility but also provided an advantageous environment for chondrocyte growth due to its multi-scale pore structure, thereby significantly promoting chondrocyte proliferation. Overall, the 3D printed tissue engineering bionic scaffold with a multi-scale pore structure developed in this study is anticipated to significantly enhance the therapeutic efficacy for auricle defects and offer a novel therapeutic strategy for such defects.

Indexed as

3D printingAuricle deformityAuricle reconstructionCartilage reconstructionTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID39968521
PMCPMC11834130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.