ArticleMedComm2025
Phase I clinical trial to assess safety and efficacy of Oraxol, a novel oral paclitaxel chemotherapy agent, in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer.
Article in MedComm, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent paclitaxel formulation strategies: expanding the therapeutic index by addressing biopharmaceutical and toxicity limitations.Archives of pharmacal research · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oraxol, a novel oral paclitaxel chemotherapy agent, has emerged as a potential alternative for treating metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, its safety and efficacy remain uncertain due to insufficient evidence supporting it. This open-label, single-arm, phase I trial was designed to assess the pharmacokinetics, safety, and preliminary antitumor activity of Oraxol in previously treated MBC. The primary objective was to investigate the pharmacokinetics of Oraxol, while secondary endpoints included assessing safety, tolerability, and antitumor activity. Twenty-four patients (median age, 53 years) were enrolled, and pharmacokinetic analysis showed consistent and reproducible absorption of Oraxol. Note that 96% patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and no deaths attributed to TRAEs. The overall response rate was 34.8%, including 34.8% achieving partial response and 56.5% having stable disease. The median follow-up was 45.7 months, with median progression-free survival (PFS) of 3.41 months and median overall survival of 17.80 months. Notably, among patients with triple-negative breast cancer, the disease control rate was 100%, and the median PFS was 8.90 months, which notably exceeded the outcomes observed in other subtypes. Oraxol significantly alters metabolism and correlates with response and survival. In conclusion, Oraxol exhibited promising antitumor efficacy and manageable safety profiles in MBC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.