Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39968451›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025

Skull vibration induced nystagmus, velocity storage and self-stability.

Ian S Curthoys, David S Zee, Georges Dumas, Christopher J Pastras, Julia Dlugaiczyk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Motorist's Disorientation Syndrome-A Narrative Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ian S CurthoysVestibular Research Laboratory, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
David S ZeeDepartments of Neurology, Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Georges DumasDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Christopher J PastrasFaculty of Science and Engineering, School of Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Julia DlugaiczykDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery & Interdisciplinary Center for Vertigo, Balance and Ocular Motor Disorders, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), University of Zurich (UZH), Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper we give an introduction to the area, followed by brief reviews of the neural response to sound and vibration, and then the velocity storage integrator, before putting forward our hypothesis about the neural input to the velocity storage integrator. Finally we discuss some of the implications of our hypothesis. There are two pathways conveying neural information from the vestibular periphery (the semicircular canals and the otoliths) to central neural mechanisms-a direct and an indirect pathway. Within the indirect pathway there is a unique neural mechanism called the velocity storage integrator (VSI) which is part of a neural network generating prolonged nystagmus, afternystagmus and the sensation of self-motion and its converse self-stability. It is our hypothesis that only neural input from primary afferent neurons with irregular resting discharge projects in the direct pathway, whereas the primary afferent input in the indirect pathway consists of neurons with regular resting discharge. The basis for this hypothesis is that vibration is a selective stimulus for vestibular neurons with irregular resting discharge. 100 Hz mastoid vibration, while capable of generating nystagmus (skull vibration induced nystagmus SVIN), is ineffective in generating afternystagmus (in the condition of an encased labyrinth) which is a marker of the action of the VSI, leading to the conclusion that irregular afferents bypass the indirect pathway and the VSI. In order to present this hypothesis we review the evidence that irregular neurons are selectively activated by sound and vibration, whereas regular neurons are not so activated. There are close similarities between the temporal characteristics of the irregular afferent neural response to vibration and the temporal characteristics of SVIN. SVIN is a simple clinical indicator of whether a patient has an imbalance between the two vestibular labyrinths and our hypothesis ties SVIN to irregular primary vestibular neurons.

Indexed as

self-motionself-stabilitysemicircular canaltinnitusutricularvelocity storage integratorvestibularvibration induced nystagmus

Identifiers

PMID39968451
PMCPMC11832403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.