ArticleCureus2025
Quantitative Outcomes of "Y" Scheduling in an Internal Medicine-Pediatrics Residency Program: First Year Data.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Scheduling resident continuity clinic sessions and outpatient education in Internal Medicine-Pediatrics (Med-Peds) residency programs pose challenges. A minority of Med-Peds programs have switched to an "X + Y" schedule (each in weeks) specifically to separate inpatient rotations and other experiences ("X" schedule) from resident continuity clinics and other outpatient longitudinal clinical and educational experiences ("Y" schedule). Outside of focus groups, quantitative data from Med-Peds residents on overall and specific satisfaction with an outpatient "Y" schedule and its specific components have not been published. We analyzed our inception year (2022-2023) Med-Peds residents' satisfaction after transitioning to a new "Y" block of outpatient education and clinical experiences in an average-sized Med-Peds program. Methods In July 2022, the "X + Y" schedule was introduced into both our Med-Peds and Pediatrics residency programs with a "6 + 2" (each in weeks) frequency upon an existing "4 + 2" (each in weeks) frequency for Internal Medicine. All Med-Peds residents (n=18) were electronically surveyed at the end of the academic year on the general "Y" schedule, continuity clinics, other outpatient clinical experiences, academic half days, administrative time, patient management skills, and the ability to make personal appointments to support wellness. Results All Med-Peds residents (n=18) were highly satisfied/satisfied with their new "Y" schedule (4.7/5) and 92% (12/13) of the postgraduate year (PGY) 2-4 felt much better/slightly better with this schedule template compared to their previous outpatient education design (4.8/5). Clinical outpatient experiences (including continuity clinic), comfort in roles/responsibilities, interest in primary care, administrative time, desktop management, and the ability to make personal appointments to support wellness were highest rated (≥ 4.0/5.0). The Med-Peds residents' favorite "Y" session was "Cohort Time", an Academic Half Day with their Med-Peds "Y" cohort colleagues for group learning and socialization. Conclusions Despite its complexities, the introduction of the "X + Y" schedule with "Y" continuity clinics and outpatient education dissociated from inpatient and other rotations in our Med-Peds residency program has been widely accepted and highly rated by residents. There has only been the need for minimal modifications for subsequent years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.