Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39968414›Full record

ReviewOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025

Management of First-Time Anterior Shoulder Dislocation-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Arthroscopy Association of Canada Position Statement.

Hassaan Abdel Khalik, Danielle Dagher, Darius Luke Lameire, Eva Gusnowski, Michaela Kolpka, Marie-Eve LeBel, Bogdan A Matache, R Kyle Martin, Mark Sommerfeldt, Ivan Wong and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hassaan Abdel KhalikMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1711-515X
Danielle DagherMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0372-8991
Darius Luke LameireUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1051-3144
Eva GusnowskiSaint John Orthopaedics, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9990-7790
Michaela KolpkaBanff Sport Medicine, Canmore, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7290-0783
Marie-Eve LeBelWestern University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6122-679X
Bogdan A MatacheLaval University, Quebec City Quebec, Canada.
R Kyle MartinUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9918-0264
Mark SommerfeldtUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Ivan WongNova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Jarret WoodmassUniversity of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Moin KhanMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8237-8095

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: While surgical stabilization is typically recommended for patients with recurrent shoulder instability, the management of first-time shoulder dislocation (FTSD) presents a unique challenge for health care providers. Purpose: To assess the efficacy of arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) compared with nonoperative management for FTSDs. Study Design: Review. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched from inception to December 26, 2023, for comparative studies assessing ABR versus nonoperative management of FTSDs. Outcomes of interest included rates of shoulder redislocation, cumulative shoulder instability (redislocation, subluxation, and/or subjective instability), subsequent shoulder stabilization surgery, return-to-sport rates, and patient-reported outcomes (Western Ontario Shoulder Instability [WOSI] score and Rowe score). Meta-analyses were performed on outcomes reported across a minimum of 3 comparative studies. Results: Eleven comparative studies with 694 patients (695 shoulders) were included in the final analysis. Patient demographics were comparable across arthroscopic stabilization (367 shoulders) and nonoperative management (328 shoulders) groups with a mean age of 21.6 ± 2.5 years across all studies, and 13.7% ± 13.6% of patients being female. The mean follow-up across all studies was 54.2 ± 28.5 months, with a mean loss to follow-up of 8.1% ± 10.3%. Meta-analyses demonstrated a reduction in the odds of cumulative instability in favor of the ABR group (odds ratio [OR], 0.04 [95% CI, 0.02 to 0.08]; Conclusion: Early ABR of first-time anterior shoulder dislocations consistently demonstrated decreased subsequent rates of cumulative instability events, shoulder redislocations, and revision surgeries relative to nonoperative management.

Indexed as

anterior shoulder dislocationanterior shoulder instabilityarthroscopic Bankart repairshoulder stabilization surgery

Identifiers

PMID39968414
PMCPMC11833906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.