Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39968378›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2025

Editome Disease Knowledgebase v2.0: an updated resource of editome-disease associations through literature curation and integrative analysis.

Tongtong Zhu, Yuan Chu, Guangyi Niu, Rong Pan, Ming Chen, Yuanyuan Cheng, Yuansheng Zhang, Zhao Li, Shuai Jiang, Lili Hao and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Tongtong ZhuNational Genomics Data Center, China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9807-5008
Yuan ChuNational Genomics Data Center, China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.
Guangyi NiuNational Genomics Data Center, China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.
Rong PanNational Genomics Data Center, China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.
Ming ChenNational Genomics Data Center, China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.
Yuanyuan ChengNational Genomics Data Center, China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.
Yuansheng ZhangNational Genomics Data Center, China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.
Zhao LiNational Genomics Data Center, China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7374-3348
Shuai JiangNational Genomics Data Center, China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6722-176X
Lili HaoNational Genomics Data Center, China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3432-7151
Dong ZouNational Genomics Data Center, China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.
Tianyi XuNational Genomics Data Center, China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4197-8163
Zhang ZhangNational Genomics Data Center, China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6603-5060

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Editome Disease Knowledgebase (EDK) is a curated resource of knowledge between RNA editome and human diseases. Since its first release in 2018, a number of studies have discovered previously uncharacterized editome-disease associations and generated an abundance of RNA editing datasets. Thus, it is desirable to make significant updates for EDK by incorporating more editome-disease associations as well as their related editing profiles. Results: Here, we present EDK v2.0, an updated version of editome-disease associations based on both literature curation and integrative analysis. EDK v2.0 incorporates a curated collection of 1097 editome-disease associations involving 115 diseases from 321 publications. Meanwhile, based on a standardized pipeline, EDK v2.0 provides RNA editing profiles from 48 datasets covering 2536 samples across 55 diseases. Through differential analysis on RNA editing, it further identifies a total of 7190 differential edited genes and 86 242 differential editing sites (DESs), leading to 266 339 DES-disease associations. Moreover, a curated list of 28 160 Availability and implementation: https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/edk/.

Identifiers

PMID39968378
PMCPMC11835235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.