ArticleBiofilm2025
Co-culture biofilm patterns among different Pseudomonas aeruginosa clones from cystic fibrosis patients.
Article in Biofilm, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methodology: Motility, gentamicin susceptibility and growth rates were assessed in four strains coming from three CF patients. The strains were subjected to whole genome sequencing with the Illumina MiSeq platform.Conjugation assays using the mini Tn7 transposon were performed in order to tag bacteria with the fluorescent proteins YFP (yellow) and CFP (cyan). Biofilm experiments were carried out in a flow cell system and images were acquired using a confocal laser microscope (CLSM) on days 3 and 5. Four experiments were performed: Experiment 1 with two clonal isolates from sinus and lungs from patient P01 (CF430-142, CF430-11621); experiments 2 (CF430-11621 + 75885-B) and 3 (CF430-11621 + 80271-B) with two lung isolates belonging to two different clones from different patients (P02, P03) and experiment 4 with one lung strain (CF430-11621) and Results: Conclusion: Mixed biofilms were only observed when identical clones from the same patient were cultured together. Our experiments indicate that twitching motility does not significantly affect biofilm formation or architecture in our isolates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.