ArticlePractical laboratory medicine2025
Biogenic amine testing in the South African public health care system.
Article in Practical laboratory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Phaeochromocytoma, paraganglioma and neuroblastoma are catecholamine secreting neuroendocrine tumours. Biochemical screening for suspected cases of these tumours involves the measurement of catecholamines and their metabolites in either urine or plasma. The South African National Health Laboratory service (NHLS) measures urine fractionated metanephrines (UMF) and normetanephrines (UNF), urine vanillylmandelic acid (UVMA) and urine homovanillic acid (UHVA). Objectives: To analyse the demographic, biochemical and testing patterns of patients' UMF, UNF, UVMA and UHVA in the NHLS. Methods: Data from January 2015 to December 2016 for all patients undergoing UMF, UNF, UVMA and UHVA testing was extracted from the NHLS central data warehouse. Neuroendocrine tumours were biochemically diagnosed when results were >2x multiples of the upper reference limits. Multiple testing was defined as ≥2 tests within a 14-day period. Ethnicity was determined through hot-deck imputation. Results: Biochemically abnormal test results were identified by UMF/UNF measurements in 98.2 % of cases. In 1.8 % of cases, the addition of UVMA resulted in a previously unidentified biochemical positive. Adult white and coloured populations have significantly less biochemically positive UMF results compared to the African population. Multiple testing resulted in discordant results for 12.8 % of UMF and 13.1 % of UNF testing. Conclusion: UVMA testing for phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma offers little benefit over testing with UMF alone. Requesting consecutive multiple samples is preferred, however, a single 24-h fractionated UMF/UNF is efficient and cost-effective for phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma screening, with further testing recommended when clinically indicated. African individuals are more likely to have raised catecholamines and requires further investigation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.