ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Effects of key parameters on pulsed field ablation of atrial fibrillation: potato experiments.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of catheter design on lesion dimensions during focal-bipolar pulsed field ablation: an in vitro potato model study.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026Article
- Electric field effects of pulsed field ablation through adjacent non-cardiac tissues in anFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Novel pulsed field ablation application method for small pulmonary veins using a pentaspline catheter: The "Jellyfish Method".HeartRhythm case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: The study aims to investigate the impact of key parameters of pulsed field ablation (PFA) on lesion depth, including voltage (V), pulse width (PW), number of pulses (P), and ablation number (N), using potato models. Methods: Potatoes are utilized as a display of the irreversible electroporation lesion. The key ablation parameters were varied systematically to explore its influences on lesion depths. Results and conclusion: The key ablation parameters have varying degrees of influence on lesion depths, following the order of PW>V; V>P; PW>P; N>P. Lesion depths increased with higher values of V and P. However, when the total number of pulses reached 9,600, there was no significant increase in injury depth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.