Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39968247›Full record

ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology2025

Is there a difference in bony stability at three months postoperatively between opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy and opening-wedge distal tuberosity osteotomy?

Suguru Koyama, Keiji Tensho, Kazushige Yoshida, Hiroki Shimodaira, Daiki Kumaki, Yusuke Maezumi, Hiroshi Horiuchi, Jun Takahashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Suguru KoyamaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-26-1, Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-8621, Japan.
Keiji TenshoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-26-1, Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-8621, Japan.
Kazushige YoshidaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-26-1, Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-8621, Japan.
Hiroki ShimodairaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-26-1, Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-8621, Japan.
Daiki KumakiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-26-1, Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-8621, Japan.
Yusuke MaezumiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-26-1, Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-8621, Japan.
Hiroshi HoriuchiDepartment of Rehabilitation, Shinshu University Hospital, 3-26-1, Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-8621, Japan.
Jun TakahashiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-26-1, Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-8621, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To compare the initial postoperative stability of opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and opening-wedge distal tuberosity osteotomy (DTO) and investigate the factors that influence initial stability. Methods: Patients with the same operative indications who underwent HTO (n = 51) and DTO (n = 55) were included. Demographic and preoperative radiographic data (weight-bearing line percentage [%WBL], femoral-tibial angle [FTA], medial proximal tibial angle [MPTA], posterior tibial slope and correction angle), and postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan data (initial postoperative stability [12 weeks postoperative], and hinge fracture [1 and 12 weeks postoperatively], and hinge length, flange thickness, flange length, axial flange osteotomy angle, sagittal flange osteotomy angle [1 week postoperatively]) were statistically analyzed. As a subgroup analysis, HTO and DTO patients were divided into Stable and Unstable groups respectively based on postoperative CT at 12 weeks; demographic and radiological data were compared. Results: Patients with DTO was significantly younger (median [range]; 59 [22, 73] vs 64 [45, 75], P = 0.02) and had a smaller preoperative deformity (%WBL: median [range]; 28.9 [12.8, 46.0] vs 24.3 [4.9, 44.3], P < 0.01, FTA: median [range]; 179.0 [173.0, 183.0] vs 180.0 [172.5, 186.2], P < 0.01, MPTA: median [range]; 84.0 [79.0, 87.1] vs 83.0 [78.2, 86.5], P = 0.04) and smaller correction angles (median [range]; 9 [6, 12] vs 10 [7, 15], P < 0.01). Postoperative CT data showed that DTO was associated with significantly more unstable cases (stable/unstable: 31/24 vs. 39/12, P = 0.02) and hinge fractures (none/1/2/3: 24/25/3/3 vs. 36/12/1/2, P < 0.01) and shorter hinge (median [range]; 27.8 [14.7, 43.4] vs 32.6 [22.5, 44.0], P < 0.01) than HTO. The Unstable DTO group had significantly shorter hinges (median [range]; 23.2 [14.7, 33.9] vs 31.1 [15.2, 43.4], P < 0.01) and thicker flanges (median [range]: 15.2 [9.0, 24.8] vs. 11.0 [6.8, 13.8], P < 0.01) than the stable group. The other data were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion: DTO resulted in less initial postoperative stability than HTO. The risk factors for initial instability in DTO were a short hinge and thick flange.

Indexed as

Distal tuberosity osteotomyFlange thicknessHigh tibial osteotomyHinge fractureHinge lengthInitial stability

Identifiers

PMID39968247
PMCPMC11832946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.