Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39968229›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

The 4E theory-based performance benchmarking of aged care service provision in community care facilities: a case study of Nanjing, China.

Wei Huang, Ying Hu, Lingzhi Li, Chendi Wang, Luyao Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wei Huang *Research Center of Smart City, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, China.
Ying Hu *Research Center of Smart City, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, China.
Lingzhi LiResearch Center of Smart City, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, China.
Chendi WangResearch Center of Smart City, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, China.
Luyao LiuResearch Center of Smart City, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global aging population is growing rapidly, and due to its large population, China is expected to become a 'super-aged society' within the next decade. Therefore, ensuring that older people can 'age in place' has become a major national priority. Community-care facilities (CCFs) play a key role in this process, but their service performance often faces challenges, with high input costs and limited output benefits. This paper aims to evaluate and improve the social and economic performance of CCFs by proposing a comprehensive framework based on the 4E (Economy, Efficiency, Effectiveness, Equity) theory. Specifically, based on the 4E theory, a literature review and correlation analysis are conducted to select performance indicators. The input-output relationships are then established according to the four dimensions of the 4E theory. These indicators and input-output relationships form the foundation for applying the δ-SBM DEA model, which is used to assess the performance of 75 CCFs in Nanjing. The study finds that the economic performance of CCFs generally lags behind their social performance, with many facilities showing inefficiency in economic indicators, characterized by high operational costs and limited profitability. Projection analysis reveals major issues in low-performing CCFs, including uneven regional distribution of facility performance, poor profitability, a shortage of skilled older people care professionals, and insufficient older people's participation. Based on these findings, the paper provides specific policy recommendations for government authorities, industry associations, and CCFs, focusing on improving cost-effectiveness, increasing the number of professionals, and enhancing older people's participation.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingHealth Services for the AgedAgedChinaEfficiency, OrganizationalHumansOrganizational Case Studiescare service provisioncommunity-careDEAeconomic performanceperformance benchmarkingsocial performance

Identifiers

PMID39968229
PMCPMC11834519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.