ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Functionally important respiratory symptoms and continued cigarette use versus e-cigarette switching: population assessment of tobacco and health study waves 2-6.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differences in respiratory wheezing between current exclusive e-cigarette users, current exclusive cigarette smokers, and never users of either product: findings from a population-based study.Harm reduction journal · 2025Article
- Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems Use and Nicotine Exposure Among Adults Who Use ENDS Alone or With Cigarettes: The Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study 2013-2019.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025Article
- Assessing the Italian version of the respiratory symptom experience scale (IT-RSES) in smokers and former smokers: a validation study.BMC public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Substitution of noncombustible tobacco products for cigarettes could improve respiratory symptoms. We hypothesized that complete cigarette-to-e-cigarette switching would improve respiratory symptoms compared to continued smoking. Methods: Longitudinal analysis of data from waves 2-6 (W2-W6; 2014-2021) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, an observational cohort study that surveyed 5653 US adults ≥18 years without COPD/chronic bronchitis/emphysema. We compiled 14,947 two-wave (1-2 year) observations with persons who smoked cigarettes at baseline and compared the relation between functionally important respiratory symptoms and switching to exclusive e-cigarette use or quitting tobacco versus continued cigarette use (reference). A 9-point wheezing/nighttime cough index was dichotomized based on index scores of ≥2 or ≥3, previously associated with poorer functional health. Multivariable models assessed how changes in cigarette use predicted worsening/improvement of symptoms. Findings: Among those with an index score <2, 3.5% switched to e-cigarettes, and 11.1% quit all tobacco. Functionally important respiratory symptoms worsened (≥2 at follow-up) in 15.4%, 10.0% and 10.1% of those who continued cigarettes, switched to e-cigarettes, and quit, respectively. Adjusted relative risk (RR) for respiratory symptom worsening was 0.69 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.52, 0.91) for e-cigarette switching and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.54, 0.97) for quitting. Of persons with index score ≥2, 2.8% switched to e-cigarettes, and 6.7% quit. Respiratory symptoms improved (<2 at follow-up) in 27.7%, 45.8% and 42.1% of those who continued cigarettes, switched to e-cigarettes, and quit, respectively. The RR for improving was 1.31 (95% CI, 1.05, 1.64) for e-cigarette switching and 1.36 (95% CI, 1.15, 1.62) for quitting. The RRs for exclusive e-cigarette use with a cutoff of ≥3 for respiratory symptom worsening and improvement were not significant (0.74 [0.53, 1.05] and 1.20 [0.95, 1.51] respectively) but were significant in an unweighted analysis that included partial data for individuals lost to follow-up (0.74 [0.57, 0.95] and 1.21 [1.06, 1.39] respectively). Interpretation: Switching completely from past 30-day use of cigarettes to e-cigarettes had short-term beneficial associations with functionally important respiratory symptoms similar to quitting tobacco completely. Funding: This manuscript is supported with Federal funds from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Department of Health and Human Services, under contract to Westat (contract nos. HHSN271201100027C and HHSN271201600001C), and through an interagency agreement between NIH NIDA and FDA CTP. Heather L. Kimmel was substantially involved in the scientific management of and providing scientific expertise for contract nos. HHSN271201100027C and HHSN271201600001C.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.