Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39968159›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2025

Pain science education concepts for pelvic pain: an e-Delphi of expert clinicians.

Amelia K Mardon, Hayley B Leake, Monique V Wilson, Emma L Karran, Romy Parker, Rinkle Malani, G Lorimer Moseley, K Jane Chalmers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amelia K MardonIIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Hayley B LeakeIIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Monique V WilsonIIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Emma L KarranIIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Romy ParkerThe Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration.
Rinkle MalaniMGM School of Physiotherapy, A Constituent Unit of MGMIHS, Aurangabad, India.
G Lorimer MoseleyIIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
K Jane ChalmersIIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Persistent pelvic pain is a prevalent condition that negatively impacts one's physical, psychological, social, and sexual wellbeing. Pain science education (PSE) involves learning about the biology of pain and is commonly integrated into the management of persistent pain. However, PSE is yet to be thoroughly investigated for persistent pelvic pain potentially due to the lack of targeted curricula, including learning concepts. The aim of this study was to gain consensus on PSE learning concepts important for persistent pelvic pain according to expert clinicians. Methods: A three-round e-Delphi survey was conducted to generate and gain consensus on important PSE learning concepts for female persistent pelvic pain among 20 international, multidisciplinary expert clinicians (e.g., physiotherapists, gynaecologists, psychologists). Learning concepts generated by clinicians were rated by importance using a six-point Likert scale. Consensus on importance rating was considered reached for items with an IQR <1.0. Results: The expert clinicians generated 125 PSE learning concepts that were considered important for persistent pelvic pain; 92 (73.6%) learning concepts reached consensus on their importance rating. Of the 125 learning concepts, 102 were generated for persistent pelvic pain in general, and were categorised into 13 overarching PSE concepts (e.g., persistent pelvic pain involves changes to the brain and nervous system). Sixteen PSE concepts were generated for specific pelvic pain conditions (e.g., endometriosis) and seven concepts for specific life stages (e.g., adolescence). Discussion: This study provides the first list of key PSE concepts tailored for persistent pelvic pain developed by expert clinicians. These concepts provide a framework for developing and implementing PSE curricula for persistent pelvic pain in research and clinical settings.

Indexed as

consensusDelphiendometriosispain science educationpatient educationpelvic pain

Identifiers

PMID39968159
PMCPMC11832528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.