ReviewHeliyon2025
CAD/CAM single prosthesis: A 25 years bibliometric assessment of prosthetic outcomes.
Review in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) single prostheses on teeth or implants are a viable option to restore edentulous spaces, using crowns. However, a comprehensive study that presents an overview of bibliometric factors related to the characteristics of this type of rehabilitation on teeth or implant is still lacking. Objective: The purpose of this bibliometric study was to assess the review progress of papers in the field of CAD/CAM single prostheses regarding bibliometric parameters of year, framework material, technology, retention, and impression. Material and methods: Four databases were assessed, and 5 bibliometric parameters were evaluated. An incidence rate ratio (IRR) was applied by using a multiple Poisson regression model (a = .05) to assess the association between single prostheses and each bibliometric parameter. Results: A 25-year bibliometric research was carried out and 1019 studies were evaluated. Of these, 805 papers met the inclusion criteria. Over time, an upward trend was observed in the publication of articles on CAD/CAM single prostheses. Studies using only additive manufacturing had a higher IRR than papers that used both technologies ( Conclusions: The number of studies that reports CAD/CAM single crowns has increased over time. Likewise, as the volume of publications with aesthetic frameworks. Additive manufacturing has been increasingly present in the most publications assessed, as well as the use of intraoral scanners for impressions. Single prostheses cemented retained were most commonly found.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.