Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39968138›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2025

Image-based and ML-driven analysis for assessing blueberry fruit quality.

Marcelo Rodrigues Barbosa Júnior, Regimar Garcia Dos Santos, Lucas de Azevedo Sales, Rônega Boa Sorte Vargas, Angelos Deltsidis, Luan Pereira de Oliveira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marcelo Rodrigues Barbosa JúniorDepartment of Horticulture, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA, 31793, USA.
Regimar Garcia Dos SantosDepartment of Horticulture, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA, 31793, USA.
Lucas de Azevedo SalesDepartment of Horticulture, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA, 31793, USA.
Rônega Boa Sorte VargasDepartment of Horticulture, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA, 31793, USA.
Angelos DeltsidisDepartment of Horticulture, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA, 31793, USA.
Luan Pereira de OliveiraDepartment of Horticulture, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA, 31793, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The assessment of blueberry fruit quality is traditionally conducted through laboratory equipment. Despite its high accuracy, this method remains destructive, labor-intensive, time-consuming, and costly. Consequently, there is a pressing need for innovative solutions such as image-based and artificial intelligence (AI)-driven analysis. To address these limitations, this study aimed to analyze whether an approach based on mobile image-based analysis combined with machine learning (ML) algorithms could develop a non-destructive framework for evaluating blueberry fruit quality, specifically focusing on total soluble solids (TSS) and firmness. Firstly, we collected numerous blueberry samples during the maturity stage to construct a comprehensive dataset. These samples were meticulously analyzed in a laboratory for diameter, TSS, firmness, and color. Simultaneously, RGB images were captured using a mobile device. These images were processed to extract spectral bands (red, green, and blue). Eight ML algorithms were employed to develop predictive models capable of predicting the qualitative parameters of the blueberries. Initially, correlation analysis demonstrated that RGB images suggestively contribute to fruit quality assessment (r < 0.41). However, the integration of ML algorithms significantly enhanced the predictive accuracy of these models (R

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceFruit firmnessPrecision horticulturePredictive modelsRGB imagesSugar content

Identifiers

PMID39968138
PMCPMC11834081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.