Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39968028›Full record

ArticleThe South African journal of physiotherapy2025

The minimal clinically important difference of the Participation Measurement Scale in chronic stroke.

Oyéné Kossi, Soraia M Silva, Francesco Lena, Mendinatou Agbetou, Thierry Adoukonou, Peter Feys, Félix Nindorera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The South African journal of physiotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Oyéné KossiNational School of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Parakou, Parakou, Benin.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9117-7191
Soraia M SilvaPostgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5929-3253
Francesco LenaDepartment of Neurology, Neuromed - Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo, Pozzilli, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5528-319X
Mendinatou AgbetouDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Parakou, Parakou, Benin.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5037-2302
Thierry AdoukonouDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Parakou, Parakou, Benin.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3236-3063
Peter FeysRehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Parakou, Benin.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5680-5495
Félix NindoreraNational Center of Reference in Physical Therapy and Medical Rehabilitation, University Hospital Roi-Khaled, Bujumbura, Burundi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1243-3597

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Participation Measurement Scale (PM-Scale) is an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-based and Rasch-built scale developed specifically to assess participation in people with stroke. Objectives: Our study aimed to estimate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the PM-Scale. Method: We performed a secondary analysis of data from the 'Circuit walking, balance, cycling and strength training' trial. Participants underwent mixed and collective physical activities or sociocultural activities for 12 weeks, and participation data were collected before and after the interventions. The activity limitations (ACTIVLIM)-Stroke scale was used as the anchor of importance. The MCID for the PM-Scale was estimated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the Youden index. Results: Data were collected from 46 people with chronic stroke, of which 22% were female, with median (Percentile 25, Percentile 75) age of 54 (44; 60) years, and time since stroke is 24 (11; 37) months. For all participants, the PM-Scale measures range from -2.98 logits to 5.02 logits. The area under the curve (AUC) for the receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-analysis was 0.74 yielding an estimated MCID of 1.98 logit for the PM-Scale. Conclusion: Our study estimated the MCID of the PM-Scale at 1.98 logit, enabling a more precise interpretation of the outcome in the clinical and research settings. Clinical implications: An improvement of at least 1.98 logit on the PM-Scale is required to induce a clinical change in the independence in activities of daily living in people with chronic stroke.

Indexed as

chronic strokemeasurementminimal clinically important differenceparticipationPM-Scalescale

Identifiers

PMID39968028
PMCPMC11830879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.