ArticleKorean journal of neurotrauma2025
Significance of Applying the New Diagnosis-Related Group Payment System in Patients With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.
Article in Korean journal of neurotrauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The new diagnosis-related group (NDRG) payment combines the original diagnosis-related group (DRG) and the fee-for-service (FFS) system, covering basic hospital services through fixed hospitalization costs based on the DRG assigned to the patient, while separate fees were applied for surgical and procedural interventions by physicians. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of payment methodology on medical costs and outcomes in patients with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods: This retrospective study included 1,247 patients who underwent inpatient neurosurgical treatment at a single regional trauma center from January 2016 to December 2022. Since the implementation of the NDRG payment system in 2019, patients were classified into the FFS and NDRG payment groups. Outcomes were evaluated using the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E) at discharge and 3 months post-traumatic event; admission days were also assessed. Total medical and out-of-pocket expenses incurred at the time of discharge were also analyzed. Results: The NDRG payment group demonstrated poorer results in GOS-E at discharge and 3 months post-TBI. However, the admission days were notably shorter. Out-of-pocket expenses were significantly lower in the NDRG payment group. While age, total medical expenses, and out-of-pocket expenses were significantly associated with the GOS-E at discharge, the NDRG payment did not correlate with the GOS-E at discharge. Notably, only the NDRG payment was significantly correlated with lower out-of-pocket expenses. Conclusion: Implementing the NDRG payment system for patients with mild TBI does not impact total medical costs but effectively reduces out-of-pocket expenses, without adversely affecting the GOS-E.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.