ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2024
Predictive value of monocyte-to-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio (MHR) for poor prognosis after intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute ischaemic stroke.
Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hypertriglyceridemia predicts good neurological outcome after mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel disease.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2026Article
- Residual inflammatory risk in ischemic stroke: incremental prognostic value of MHR and NPAR beyond the Essen stroke risk score.BMC neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between monocyte-to-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio (MHR) and poor short-term 3-month and long-term 6-month prognosis after intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Material and methods: By retrospective analysis, 763 eligible patients with acute ischaemic stroke with intravenous thrombolysis were included in the study, and the general data and clinical laboratory examination results of the patients were collected. The relationship between MHR and poor prognosis at 3 and 6 months in patients with intravenous thrombolysis was derived by stepwise regression using the R language, followed by 1:1 propensity score matching to determine the MHR threshold and to investigate the relationship between high and low MHR values and poor prognosis. Results: MHR level was found to predict the prognosis of intravenous thrombolysis patients with acute ischaemic stroke, and it was an effective predictor of poor prognosis at 3 and 6 months after intravenous thrombolysis. MHR has a threshold of 0.584. High MHR levels were strongly associated with a poor 3-month prognosis of intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (OR = 5.657; 95% CI: 4.124-7.762; Conclusions: MHR level is a valid predictor for poor prognosis at 3-6 months after intravenous thrombolysis in patients in acute ischaemic stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.