ArticleJournal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS2024
Acceptance of Open Preperitoneal Repair in Inguinal Hernia Surgery Delphi-Consensus After an Anonymous International Survey Among European Hernia Society Members.
Article in Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tailor-made approach for ambulatory open groin hernia repair: our experience of over 7000 cases.Surgery today · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: For years, the Lichtenstein technique was the gold standard for open repair, but several open pre-peritoneal techniques have developed since the fifties of the 20th century that offer some benefits over the Lichtenstein technique in terms of post-surgical incidence of pain. Since the 2023 update of the International HerniaSurge Guidelines, open preperitoneal mesh techniques have been an acceptable alternative, providing available expertise and competence with at least equal results as Lichtenstein repair. Aim: The aim of this project is to understand the views of surgeons regarding the approach to inguinal hernia repair and determine best practice principles for optimal surgical outcomes. Methods: Using a modified Delphi method, a panel of experts developed 43 Likert scale statements across six key domains. These statements were used to develop an online survey distributed to surgeons in Europe involved in inguinal hernia repair. The threshold for consensus was set Results: A total of 202 responses were received from surgeons involved in inguinal hernia repair over three rounds of survey. After the initial survey round, seven statements were revised and reissued for a further round. At the conclusion of the survey phase, 31 of the 38 remaining statements achieved consensus (of which 13 achieved ≥90% agreement). From these results, the panellists developed a set of 3 recommendations to help define principles for optimal approach to inguinal hernia repair. Accordingly Open preperitoneal techniques seems to be an alternative to Lichtenstein technique if expertise is available and should be included in a tailored concept. Knowledge of anatomy, Education and Training in open preperitoneal techniques is crucial for the acceptance of these techniques. Conclusion: The proposed set of recommendations provides some principles for surgeons to consider when selecting an approach to inguinal hernia repair, ensuring good patient outcomes in a practical and cost-effective manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.