ReviewClinical kidney journal2024
Perception of nephrology in Europe: a strategy to improve recruitment of motivated fellows.
Review in Clinical kidney journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementing virtual reality for emergency training in nephrology: a large-scale study on educational impact and acceptance.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
- Gamified renal point-of-care ultrasound to promote recruitment and anatomical competence in nephrology.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
- Ten tips to teach learners to love nephrology (and recruit the next generation).Clinical kidney journal · 2025Review
- [Resilience is job satisfaction using nephrology as an example].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The shortage of applications for fellowships in nephrology is a worldwide challenge. This is the first survey to explore in Europe the reasons physicians choose (and do not choose) a career in nephrology. Methods: An anonymous questionnaire was sent to the presidents of societies that are members of the European Renal Association (ERA), who invited trainees and nephrologists to respond. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v.26. (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous variables were compared by Student's Results: Responders included 516 (49%) females and 542 (51%) males. They comprised 278 (26%) trainees, and 780 (74%) nephrologists. The majority (64%) believe that students have an unfavourable perception of nephrology. For trainees, nephrology is not considered an attractive option due to 'chronically ill patients' (35%), 'lack of contact during undergraduate training' (37%), 'nephrology is too challenging' (38%), 'poor remuneration' (22%), 'negative role models' (15%), and 'long working hours' (14%). The factors with the greatest impact on choosing a career include a positive role model (46%), practical experience during medical school and early postgraduate training (42%). Conclusion: Trainees emphasize that work-life balance is very important for the younger generation. A strong mentorship along with early engagement is associated with a higher likelihood of pursuing a career in nephrology. It is crucial to create a strategy that will provide a positive experience, renew the interest in nephrology careers and ensure enough nephrologists to treat the growing number of patients with kidney disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.