ArticleAJOG global reports2025
Variations in emergency care for severe pre-eclampsia in Uganda: a national evaluation study.
Article in AJOG global reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Challenges and Prospects in Managing Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Narrative Review.International journal of women's health · 2026Review
- Knowledge of Pre-Eclampsia and Its Risk Factors Among Pregnant Women Attending Antenatal Care in Lango Sub-Region, Northern Uganda.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Worldwide, 70% of maternal deaths occur in Sub-Saharan Africa. Approximately 10% are attributable to hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, primarily complications of pre-eclampsia. Timely and effective care improves outcomes, but this is not consistently available, particularly in low-resource settings such as Uganda. Objectives: We conducted a national evaluation of the provision of prompt and safe care for women with severe pre-eclampsia across all regions of Uganda. We explored the wider health system-related factors, eg supply availability, facilities, and emergency training drills, that may affect the ability of healthcare facilities to deliver optimal pre-eclampsia care. Study design: A multidisciplinary research team carried out in-person, unannounced visits to maternity facilities across Uganda to assess the quality of care provided. Evaluations of facilities, staff interviews, and case notes reviews were performed. Results: 75 maternity facilities were included from all regions of Uganda. Of these, 25% were unable to provide correct emergency care for severe pre-eclampsia, and 21% were unable to consistently provide delivery or referral for eclamptic seizure within 12 hours. Factors strongly associated with not providing optimal pre-eclampsia care were lack of staff training, lack of readily available clinical protocols, lack of antenatal education, lack of close postnatal monitoring and care that was not always woman-centered. Conclusions: The key barriers associated with delayed or poor quality pre-eclampsia care across Uganda are potentially modifiable with strengthened clinical governance initiatives. Developing context-specific, standardized, national training and educational programmes could be effective in reducing rates of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality from pre-eclampsia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.