ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Biocidal Efficacies of Contact Lens Disinfecting Solutions Against Gram-Negative Organisms Associated with Lens Case-Associated Corneal Infiltrative Events.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Multi-purpose solutions (MPSs) are designed to clean, disinfect, and condition contact lenses (CLs) to reduce the risk of contact lens-related adverse events, such as corneal infiltrative events (CIEs) that are often associated with opportunistic bacteria from contaminated CLs or CL cases. This study evaluated the disinfection efficacies of six MPSs and one hydrogen peroxide solution (HPS) comparator against three lens case CIE-associated organisms. Methods: The solutions in this study were evaluated against commonly isolated Gram-negative lens case CIE-associated organisms in the presence of organic soil, according to the International Organization for Standardization 14729 (ISO) stand-alone test protocol. Challenge organisms ( Results: Stand-alone testing against the challenge organisms demonstrated that PAPB/Alexidine/PQ-1, Alexidine/PQ-1, and PHMB-containing MPSs, as well as HPS were significantly superior versus MAPD/PQ-1-based MPSs (all p < 0.05). While there is no ISO criteria for reduction of CIE-associated organisms, all solutions containing PAPB/Alexidine/PQ-1, Alexidine/PQ-1, and PHMB, as well as HPS, achieved greater than 3-log reductions (the primary criteria for ISO 14729 compendial bacterial organisms) for all challenge organisms. The three MAPD/PQ-1-containing MPSs achieved between 0.6 and 1.7 log reduction across the MPS/test organism combinations. Conclusion: The PAPB, PHMB, and Alexidine-based MPSs demonstrated significantly greater disinfection efficacy than MAPD-based MPSs, and comparable disinfection efficacy to HPS, against commonly isolated Gram-negative CL case CIE-associated organisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.