ArticleAJPM focus2025
Disparities in COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake Among Pregnant People in a Diverse Urban Population With High Vaccine Acceptance.
Article in AJPM focus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trophoblast ferroptosis restricts SARS-CoV-2 spread in the placenta.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: This study's objective was to compare COVID-19 vaccination rates between pregnant individuals in San Francisco and the city's similarly aged population and to identify the factors associated with vaccine uptake in the pregnant population. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients delivering at 2 hospitals in San Francisco from March 15, 2021, to October 15, 2021. Reference COVID-19 vaccination rates for San Francisco were obtained from the California Immunization Registry. The primary outcome was completion of a COVID-19 vaccine series among pregnant individuals compared with that in the San Francisco general population aged 18-45 years. Secondary outcomes included factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant people. Results: Of 2,294 pregnant individuals, 1,181 (51.5%) completed a COVID-19 vaccine series by delivery. Pregnant individuals were less likely to be vaccinated than the San Francisco population throughout the study period. Factors associated with lower vaccination rates in pregnant individuals included public insurance (AOR=0.21, 95% CI=0.16, 0.27), younger age (AOR=0.74, 95% CI=0.64, 0.86), English language preference (AOR=0.58, 95% CI=0.42, 0.80), and self-identified Black (AOR=0.26, 95% CI=0.17, 0.40) (ref: White), Hispanic (AOR=0.61, 95% CI=0.46, 0.81), or other (AOR=0.50, 95% CI=0.36, 0.68) race or ethnicity. Conclusions: COVID-19 vaccination coverage among pregnant people in San Francisco lagged behind that of the city's similarly aged population, particularly among those with public insurance and of non-White race. Despite locally high vaccine acceptance, additional efforts are needed to address barriers and reduce disparities in COVID-19 vaccination within the pregnant population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.