ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2025
Aspects of dignity in family caregivers of persons suffering from multiple sclerosis.
Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe focus of this study is on preserved dignity and dignity violation of family caregivers of persons suffering from multiple sclerosis.
aimThe aim of the study was to get a deeper understanding of how family caregivers of persons suffering from multiple sclerosis perceive that their dignity is preserved or deprived. METHODOLOGY: A hermeneutic approach was employed. RESEARCH
methodsThe authors conducted research interviews in the form of conversations with eight family caregivers. ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
methodsOur compass and guide in the interpretation process were Gadamer's hermeneutics and the pursuit of the study' purpose. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: The participants were informed of the possibility of being able to withdraw from the study whenever they wished.
resultsPreserved dignity through: Doing good for others; Compassion with and bearing burdens of others; Being reconciled with life; Violated dignity caused by insensitive health care professionals, public authorities, health care systems and friends.
conclusionThe family caregivers preserve their dignity by doing good for their loved ones, bearing their burdens and when they become reconciled with life. Their dignity is violated when being met by insensitive healthcare professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.