SynthesisPM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation2025
Efficacy of conservative intervention for kinesiophobia in individuals with a history of ankle sprain: A systematic review.
Synthesis in PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy of conservative intervention for kinesiophobia in individuals with a history of ankle sprain: A systematic review.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the effect of conservative interventions on kinesiophobia, a fear-avoidance belief regarding exercise, in individuals who have had a lateral ankle sprain. LITERATURE SURVEY: Systematic computerized literature search was performed using PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Sciences, and Cochrane Library databases. Randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of conservative interventions on kinesiophobia in individuals with a history of lateral ankle sprain, including chronic ankle instability, compared to those of control, sham, or different conservative interventions were included. They were written in English and published prior to December 2023. METHODOLOGY: Two independent reviewers screened the studies using specific eligibility criteria. Study characteristics, patients, intervention and comparator, and outcome were extracted. Outcomes were defined as kinesiophobia observed using a questionnaire (eg, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11) or other means. The risk of bias was assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials. SYNTHESIS: Five randomized controlled trials were included. These studies examined the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation, joint mobilization, balance and strength training, visual biofeedback during multimodal training, and low-friction patches attached to the outside of shoes, respectively. Limited evidence from single studies showed that the visual biofeedback during walking and low-friction patches attached on the outside of shoes were significantly more effective than the control and other treatments for kinesiophobia in individuals with a history of a lateral ankle sprain. Because the intervention and control groups differed between studies, data synthesis through meta-analysis was not performed.
conclusionsVisual biofeedback during walking and low-friction patches attached on the outside of shoes may improve kinesiophobia in patients with a history of lateral ankle sprains. An approach to sensory-perceptual impairment in individuals with a history of lateral ankle sprains may be more effective in improving kinesiophobia. These conservative interventions may have an effect on kinesiophobia, but the evidence is limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.