ArticleJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2025
Dietary Counselling Interventions in Malnutrition Research: Achieving an International Consensus on Best Practices Using an Amended Delphi Process.
Article in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Family-Centred Telehealth-Enhanced Dietary Counselling for the Treatment of Protein-Energy Malnutrition in Rural-Living Older Adults Transitioning From Rehabilitation to Home: A Pilot Controlled Trial.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026Trial
- Impact of COVID-19 on early identification of protein-energy malnutrition in the cancer care setting: a repeated cross-sectional survey of cancer care professionals.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe evidence for the use of dietary counselling interventions in the management of malnutrition is inconsistent. Lack of consistency limits the ability to compare studies, impacting research, clinical practice and policy development.
aimsTo establish an international consensus on minimum requirements for dietary counselling interventions used for the prevention and management of malnutrition in adults in a clinical research context.
methodsAn international expert panel with seven members was formed. An amended Delphi study was conducted with 37 initial consensus statements generated from a targeted search of the literature. The agreement was assessed across two Delphi rounds and two online meetings. The full consensus was defined as the assignment of a score of 5 (strongly agree). A preliminary external validation was conducted with clinical and/or research dietetic professionals when delegates at the International Congress of Dietetics (ICD) 2021 voted during an online meeting on agreement with statements relating to patient assessment and delivery of a dietary counselling intervention.
resultsConsensus was achieved for 27 statements across four themes, with justifications and commentary. Minimum requirements included eight statements for 'nutritional assessment' (theme 1), seven for 'nutritional intervention content' (theme 2), five for 'nutritional intervention delivery' (theme 3) and seven for 'monitoring and follow-up' (theme 4). The ICD delegates voted on elements of assessment (77 of 140 delegates in agreement) and delivery of the intervention (37 of 101 delegates in agreement), demonstrating that consensus on these aspects of nutritional support interventions was low to moderate in this delegate sample.
conclusionsConsensus was achieved by an international group of experts to define the minimum essential factors for delivering dietary counselling interventions for the management of malnutrition in a research context; however, further external validation is required. The minimum requirements have the potential to influence research, clinical practice and policy development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.